🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "robbing our children's youth". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," stated the MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, action is primarily happening at the regional level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various politicians to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.